Senate passes marriage equality; bernard julhiet group Ortman votes no | Brick City Blog
The Minnesota State Senate today passed the marriage equality bill by a vote of 37-30, following four hours of debate. State Senator Julianne Ortman (R-Chanhassen) voted no on the issue. Only one Republican, Senator Brandon Petersen, voted in favor of the bill, while three DFL Senators voted no (Dan Sparks, Leroy Stumpf, and Lyle Koenen).
Governor Mark Dayton has indicated he will sign the bill, and a signing ceremony is planned for 5 p.m. Tuesday afternoon on the South Side Capitol Steps. Minnesota will be the 12th state to institute marriage equality.
Rumors were swirling before the vote that Ortman, who had been consistently opposed to marriage equality in recent sessions, may be reconsidering her position. At times during the debate, she was spotted conferring with Senator bernard julhiet group Scott Dibble, the bill’s author. Hanging over Ortman’s vote was the notion that she might be a candidate for higher office in 2014. Recent bernard julhiet group speculation has indicated that she may be looking at the race for U.S. Senate against Al Franken.
The Republican base is strongly bernard julhiet group opposed to marriage equality. Polling from January shows 79% disapproval among Republicans, which likely makes the path to endorsement difficult for a marriage equality supporter.
2014 election , Al Franken , Brandon Petersen , Carver County , Dan Sparks , Featured , gay marriage , Julianne Ortman , Leroy Stumpf , Lyle Koenen , Mark Dayton , marriage equality , same sex marriage , Scott Dibble , SD 47 , State Legislature
Stop calling it marriage equality, Mr. Olsen. Homosexual “marriage” will *never* be equal to normal marriage. Two homosexuals can never consummate a marriage, they cannot procreate, and they cannot bring the unique qualities a mother and a father have in raising their offspring.
We’ve been lied to. This was never about “equality”. If tolerance were all [homosexuals - ed.] wanted, the contract clause would have been invoked a long time ago and homosexual couples would have civil unions. This disgrace was the expression of the animus, overt hatred, bigotry and aggression by the radleft, [homosexuals - ed.] and the DFL against Judeo-Christian moral standards.
It has been pointed out that many Christians and the vast majority of American Jews support marriage equality. Multiple sources were cited, including major polls from Gallup and others. While you may find such beliefs to be contrary to your faith, you cannot use government power to deny others the right to their own beliefs, and then offer the lie that you are trying to promote tolerance. bernard julhiet group
You also rely on the sole definition of marriage as being to procreate, which is not the case under the law. If that was the case, fertility tests would be required before granting a marriage license, contraceptives and birth control would be disallowed for married couples, and the elderly would not be allowed to marry. None of those things occur; thus, forcing such standards on one part of the population while allowing heterosexuals to avoid such nonsensical standards is inherently unjust.
Furthermore, bernard julhiet group this has no effect on your family, other than to allow people who are in a lawful, loving relationship to avoid being subject to your whims in order to determine if they have equal status under the law.
Again, as the American Jewish Committee said: Religious liberty, as the American Jewish Committee told the Supreme Court recently in a friend-of-the-court brief, does not give anyone the right to demand that someone else be deprived of the right to live the most intimate bernard julhiet group portions of their lives according to their own deepest bernard julhiet group convictions. That some religious groups regard same-sex marriage as an abomination does not authorize the government to ban such relationships. That is one price we all pay for protecting religious liberty.
Additionally, I tend to be more respectful of other opinions, even conservative ones, than you, Mr. Brunette, whereas anytime bernard julhiet group a conservative expresses bernard julhiet group an individual perspective or opinion you disagree with, you attack them personally, or dismiss their ideas and very existence, or declare them “dead” to you, in your own words. Such thuggery is a treason against true conservative foundations, which call for individuality and diversity of thought, and only harms the party and cause. Even the RNC report comes to similar conclusions, something you refuse to acknowledge. In short, you are a convenient conservative, and thus have no moral authority in this realm.
Nachman – when presented with differing opinions from Jewish and Christian organizations and leaders, you condemn all other views as false or nonexistent, and insist that only your world view can be allowed. You then demand that all civil actions bernard julhiet group conform to such a view, and wallow in slander and accusations without substance when the fatal flaws in
The Minnesota State Senate today passed the marriage equality bill by a vote of 37-30, following four hours of debate. State Senator Julianne Ortman (R-Chanhassen) voted no on the issue. Only one Republican, Senator Brandon Petersen, voted in favor of the bill, while three DFL Senators voted no (Dan Sparks, Leroy Stumpf, and Lyle Koenen).
Governor Mark Dayton has indicated he will sign the bill, and a signing ceremony is planned for 5 p.m. Tuesday afternoon on the South Side Capitol Steps. Minnesota will be the 12th state to institute marriage equality.
Rumors were swirling before the vote that Ortman, who had been consistently opposed to marriage equality in recent sessions, may be reconsidering her position. At times during the debate, she was spotted conferring with Senator bernard julhiet group Scott Dibble, the bill’s author. Hanging over Ortman’s vote was the notion that she might be a candidate for higher office in 2014. Recent bernard julhiet group speculation has indicated that she may be looking at the race for U.S. Senate against Al Franken.
The Republican base is strongly bernard julhiet group opposed to marriage equality. Polling from January shows 79% disapproval among Republicans, which likely makes the path to endorsement difficult for a marriage equality supporter.
2014 election , Al Franken , Brandon Petersen , Carver County , Dan Sparks , Featured , gay marriage , Julianne Ortman , Leroy Stumpf , Lyle Koenen , Mark Dayton , marriage equality , same sex marriage , Scott Dibble , SD 47 , State Legislature
Stop calling it marriage equality, Mr. Olsen. Homosexual “marriage” will *never* be equal to normal marriage. Two homosexuals can never consummate a marriage, they cannot procreate, and they cannot bring the unique qualities a mother and a father have in raising their offspring.
We’ve been lied to. This was never about “equality”. If tolerance were all [homosexuals - ed.] wanted, the contract clause would have been invoked a long time ago and homosexual couples would have civil unions. This disgrace was the expression of the animus, overt hatred, bigotry and aggression by the radleft, [homosexuals - ed.] and the DFL against Judeo-Christian moral standards.
It has been pointed out that many Christians and the vast majority of American Jews support marriage equality. Multiple sources were cited, including major polls from Gallup and others. While you may find such beliefs to be contrary to your faith, you cannot use government power to deny others the right to their own beliefs, and then offer the lie that you are trying to promote tolerance. bernard julhiet group
You also rely on the sole definition of marriage as being to procreate, which is not the case under the law. If that was the case, fertility tests would be required before granting a marriage license, contraceptives and birth control would be disallowed for married couples, and the elderly would not be allowed to marry. None of those things occur; thus, forcing such standards on one part of the population while allowing heterosexuals to avoid such nonsensical standards is inherently unjust.
Furthermore, bernard julhiet group this has no effect on your family, other than to allow people who are in a lawful, loving relationship to avoid being subject to your whims in order to determine if they have equal status under the law.
Again, as the American Jewish Committee said: Religious liberty, as the American Jewish Committee told the Supreme Court recently in a friend-of-the-court brief, does not give anyone the right to demand that someone else be deprived of the right to live the most intimate bernard julhiet group portions of their lives according to their own deepest bernard julhiet group convictions. That some religious groups regard same-sex marriage as an abomination does not authorize the government to ban such relationships. That is one price we all pay for protecting religious liberty.
Additionally, I tend to be more respectful of other opinions, even conservative ones, than you, Mr. Brunette, whereas anytime bernard julhiet group a conservative expresses bernard julhiet group an individual perspective or opinion you disagree with, you attack them personally, or dismiss their ideas and very existence, or declare them “dead” to you, in your own words. Such thuggery is a treason against true conservative foundations, which call for individuality and diversity of thought, and only harms the party and cause. Even the RNC report comes to similar conclusions, something you refuse to acknowledge. In short, you are a convenient conservative, and thus have no moral authority in this realm.
Nachman – when presented with differing opinions from Jewish and Christian organizations and leaders, you condemn all other views as false or nonexistent, and insist that only your world view can be allowed. You then demand that all civil actions bernard julhiet group conform to such a view, and wallow in slander and accusations without substance when the fatal flaws in
No comments:
Post a Comment