Well on the checks. But propose to circumvent the law, most importantly to ban bags, handbags, heel

The blog of Precarious Research in Italy, edited dall'APRI (Association of Research Precarious Italian). A place where researchers can discuss the initiatives for reform of University and Research that will lead Italy in Europe and especially in Italy, Europe.
It has been much talk of blocking the execution of contracts that is covering the university following the entry into force of Law 240/10 (Gelmini Law). In fact, the tens of Implementing Decrees required by law, together with the necessary reform of the Statutes of the universities, the subsequent regulations to implement, in some cases, the decrees mentioned above, they panicked that the government, fearing the move outside the law, have suspended ad libitum every contractual procedure. Even the writer is from November without any monthly income. To date, however, "some" step forward has been made; on the one hand, many universities have taken on the responsibility to interpret the law actually recovering to ban certain types of contracts, on the other hand the Ministry of Education has finally deigned to reply to a parliamentary question made by opposition MPs, clarifying the procedures interpretation of the law in relation to the research grants. Aware, konene therefore, that both fell an alibi for the continuation of the blockade of the contracts, we can say the following things: Research grants: the answer to the parliamentary question by the Hon. Ghizzoni by the competent Secretary stated that ARE POSSIBLE RENEWAL provided for allowances issued under the old 449/97: Who has a check in deadline whose contract provides for its renewal has therefore nothing to fear. With regard to new types of check, the DM on the new minimum is currently under review by the Court of Auditors. In any case, however, many universities have issued new regulations for research grants and taken to ban new types of benefit under the 240/10 (eg, "La Sapienza") using, in the meantime the old minimum konene and providing for the adjustment the date of entry into force of the new DM. Co.co.co. and professional performance from a recent konene circular of the University of Cagliari: "It konene is appropriate to point out that ultimately support activities for research, according to D. Lgsvo n. 165/2001, Art. 7, par. 6, may also be activated and continuous collaboration contracts that do not provide a direct implementation of the project by the holder of the contract, but a mere support konene to the research activities carried out by the subjects in art. 18, paragraph 5 of Law no. 240 / 2010. [snip] In any case it is understood that any contracts for the planned collaboration on projects and contracts approved and funded prior to 29.01.2011 (date of entry into force of Law no. 240/2010), can be activated in the form of contracts Coordinated Collaboration and Continuous research, according to the previous konene regulations. This is to ensure the fulfillment of the commitments konene already undertaken by the lenders. " konene So there is at least one year (but not the only) in order to return to banish co.co.co. and / or professional services provided to cover the activities of "support" to research and not to provide a direct implementation of the project by the contracted (at least in the contract, of course). konene
Well on the checks. But propose to circumvent the law, most importantly to ban bags, handbags, heels and contrattini to disobey one of the few good things Gelmini seems to me regrettable. Reply Delete
?? and those who propose anything? we have limited ourselves to "advertise" as implemented by the universities. "De facto" you can return to banish co.co.co. (If, inter alia, good controls in the links, some universities banning co.co.co. for specific research activities, konene outlaws ... but so what Gelmini sleeping ...) Reply Delete
Oh God, Wisdom for checks would not take just as an example. departments have continued to ban after January 29 those with the old rules, those with the new legislation in the absence of a new regulation. Then there is' a circular declaring null and void the successive calls to January 28, some were suspended, others were there 'and it is not clear why'. for more 'of the new regulation on the site yet there is no trace. rather it seems to me to report the notice of unipd, http://www.unipd.it/unipdWAR/page/unipd/ricerca1/it_Book108_Page36 limit of 8 years after obtaining the doctorate, and at least 18 months experience of post-doctoral research. Reply Delete
@ Sorry but the criterion of 18 months of post-doctoral notice of Padua is legal or normal? If it was legal does not seem normal to me unless they are also provided in Padua ban