Food-bullshit at the festival | SAKSYNT
Tags: organic øyafestivalen photographing food biodiversity biodynamic agricultural pesticides Oikos 247 Comments festival has a strong environmental profile, which is basically good. They focus on environmentally friendly transport to and from the festival area (walking, cycling, public transport), recycling / waste management, eco-friendly print and toilet paper and eco-friendly ...
I love the festival. It is an incredibly well-organized and delicious festival, photographing food and I've been at the festival every year for the last 10 years (or thereabouts). So again this year. On Thursday, I and my daughter Maya stopped for several hours and looked, and she thought there were a lot of all the activities there. Specifically, photographing food we spent a lot of time in the tents of Source separation in Oslo, where I also won a Friday pass by creating an anagram photographing food of just "Source separation in Oslo." (My winning entry was: "The pigs enough in Oslo.")
Festival has a strong environmental profile, which is basically good. They focus on environmentally friendly transport to and from the festival area (walking, cycling, public transport), recycling / waste management, eco-friendly print and toilet paper, and environmentally friendly power supply. Unfortunately, this seems to also take with them a focus on organic food, as if it has something to do with the environment:
We are discerning in terms of which bands we book the festival - and the same applies to what restaurants we have with us. With us you get Norway's best - and greenest - festivalmat. In 2013 we served over 30 tons of organic produce to the public, volunteers and artists. This accounted for almost 90% of all ingredients used. We believe that only natural ingredients from sustainable farming is good enough for our audience.
We are committed photographing food to protecting the environment and believes organic food production is an integral photographing food part of a sustainable photographing food future. Choosing organic, opt out artificial additives, pesticides and industrial animal husbandry. At the same time you say yes to cleaner and healthier foods, better animal welfare, a greater biological diversity and less environmentally hostile emissions. Besides tasting food just so much better.
No, no and no again. Organically grown food is healthier. Nope. Nope. Nothing suggests that the marginal remains of pesticides on conventionally grown foods have some negative health consequences, and organically grown food is not deleted free of pesticides. Animal welfare is only marginally better, and many are fooled by a false confidence that organic guarantee good welfare. The biological diversity is greater for some practically relevant scale. If it gives less environmentally hostile emissions is also questionable, and a number of blind tests have shown that people can not taste the difference between organic and conventionally grown foods. It is the placebo effect.
They work unfortunately with Oikos has a scary unscientific relation to reality, and constantly spreading distorted versions of studies on organic agriculture and food. They are a fraudulent propaganda center for organic farming, with an alternative medical approach to scientific research and interpretation of studies.
Unfortunately, the festival draws even longer, as I pointed out in my tweet from yesterday. They boast namely that island-coffee (and some other food) is not only organic, but also "biodynamic." It is a sales gimmick without any value for the consumer. The idea of biodynamics in practice witchcraft and magic, and it is an insult photographing food to the festival participants' intelligence that the festival chose to sell themselves as environmentally friendly by focusing on such oratory.
Research on comprehensive analysis, including photographing food biokrystallisasjonsmetoden show that biodynamic foods generally have greater vitality and inner quality than products from other forms of production.
Biodynamic agriculture is based on the "philosopher photographing food Rudolf Steiner's ideas about how humans, nature and the cosmos is interconnected, and the spiritual photographing food philosophy of anthroposophy." Fair enough, but then comes the big problem with biodynamic agriculture. Just listen to the requirements photographing food that apply to this type of food production:
Differences from other types of organic farming is to use an astronomical calendar to determine when planting, harvesting etc. To happen, photographing food and that you use homeopathic preparations including composting; methods that critics would call superstition that has no effect photographing food in either photographing food direction.
The starting point is the solar power and the rhythmic processes, where the earth is part of a planetary photographing food system with limited rhythms, lunar rhythms and seasons. All this affects how plants grow. Both phases of the moon and its rhythm photographing food over the firmament influence.
Rudolf Steiner warned against chemical production aids that were introduced in agriculture in the early 1900s. He believed that this meant that agriculture in many ways was pulled out of the natural context. I st
Tags: organic øyafestivalen photographing food biodiversity biodynamic agricultural pesticides Oikos 247 Comments festival has a strong environmental profile, which is basically good. They focus on environmentally friendly transport to and from the festival area (walking, cycling, public transport), recycling / waste management, eco-friendly print and toilet paper and eco-friendly ...
I love the festival. It is an incredibly well-organized and delicious festival, photographing food and I've been at the festival every year for the last 10 years (or thereabouts). So again this year. On Thursday, I and my daughter Maya stopped for several hours and looked, and she thought there were a lot of all the activities there. Specifically, photographing food we spent a lot of time in the tents of Source separation in Oslo, where I also won a Friday pass by creating an anagram photographing food of just "Source separation in Oslo." (My winning entry was: "The pigs enough in Oslo.")
Festival has a strong environmental profile, which is basically good. They focus on environmentally friendly transport to and from the festival area (walking, cycling, public transport), recycling / waste management, eco-friendly print and toilet paper, and environmentally friendly power supply. Unfortunately, this seems to also take with them a focus on organic food, as if it has something to do with the environment:
We are discerning in terms of which bands we book the festival - and the same applies to what restaurants we have with us. With us you get Norway's best - and greenest - festivalmat. In 2013 we served over 30 tons of organic produce to the public, volunteers and artists. This accounted for almost 90% of all ingredients used. We believe that only natural ingredients from sustainable farming is good enough for our audience.
We are committed photographing food to protecting the environment and believes organic food production is an integral photographing food part of a sustainable photographing food future. Choosing organic, opt out artificial additives, pesticides and industrial animal husbandry. At the same time you say yes to cleaner and healthier foods, better animal welfare, a greater biological diversity and less environmentally hostile emissions. Besides tasting food just so much better.
No, no and no again. Organically grown food is healthier. Nope. Nope. Nothing suggests that the marginal remains of pesticides on conventionally grown foods have some negative health consequences, and organically grown food is not deleted free of pesticides. Animal welfare is only marginally better, and many are fooled by a false confidence that organic guarantee good welfare. The biological diversity is greater for some practically relevant scale. If it gives less environmentally hostile emissions is also questionable, and a number of blind tests have shown that people can not taste the difference between organic and conventionally grown foods. It is the placebo effect.
They work unfortunately with Oikos has a scary unscientific relation to reality, and constantly spreading distorted versions of studies on organic agriculture and food. They are a fraudulent propaganda center for organic farming, with an alternative medical approach to scientific research and interpretation of studies.
Unfortunately, the festival draws even longer, as I pointed out in my tweet from yesterday. They boast namely that island-coffee (and some other food) is not only organic, but also "biodynamic." It is a sales gimmick without any value for the consumer. The idea of biodynamics in practice witchcraft and magic, and it is an insult photographing food to the festival participants' intelligence that the festival chose to sell themselves as environmentally friendly by focusing on such oratory.
Research on comprehensive analysis, including photographing food biokrystallisasjonsmetoden show that biodynamic foods generally have greater vitality and inner quality than products from other forms of production.
Biodynamic agriculture is based on the "philosopher photographing food Rudolf Steiner's ideas about how humans, nature and the cosmos is interconnected, and the spiritual photographing food philosophy of anthroposophy." Fair enough, but then comes the big problem with biodynamic agriculture. Just listen to the requirements photographing food that apply to this type of food production:
Differences from other types of organic farming is to use an astronomical calendar to determine when planting, harvesting etc. To happen, photographing food and that you use homeopathic preparations including composting; methods that critics would call superstition that has no effect photographing food in either photographing food direction.
The starting point is the solar power and the rhythmic processes, where the earth is part of a planetary photographing food system with limited rhythms, lunar rhythms and seasons. All this affects how plants grow. Both phases of the moon and its rhythm photographing food over the firmament influence.
Rudolf Steiner warned against chemical production aids that were introduced in agriculture in the early 1900s. He believed that this meant that agriculture in many ways was pulled out of the natural context. I st
No comments:
Post a Comment