I refer to the proposal published recently (I do not put the link, otherwise I ricensurano the comm

We report the parliamentary question tabled by Senator. George Pagliari about the timeframe bidvest australia within which committees should finish bidvest australia the work of the authorization National Scientific 2013.
Given that: it appears that the Committees for the National Scientific bidvest australia Qualifications have had extended the deadline for the completion of 31.5.2014, as the Director General of the Ministry has used the possibility of granting extension of time originally foreseen (Article 4, paragraph 6, second sentence, of the Directorial Decree n. 161 of 2013). that, even for commissions that have done so due to their obligations, in particular with the approval of the criteria that gave rise to the consequent effect of 15 days. waivers for any of the candidates, to date there have been open procedures necessary for the commission may have the useful data at the start of evaluations. As of today are not in a position to know either what and how many candidates, nor read the publications presented; it is almost bidvest australia impossible for the commission to conclude bidvest australia the work in just 50 days (this is to read thousands of pages of text, sound judgments individual and collegial, check the regularity of claims, etc.).
to know the reasons that prevent the commission, also already bidvest australia in a position to start work, to access data and when this opportunity will occur; to know how this Ministry intends to ensure the completion bidvest australia and smooth functioning of these evaluation procedures, whether they are imaginable, and on what legal basis, further extensions bidvest australia of the deadline of May 31, 2014, after which there would be the forfeiture of the Committee and the establishment of a new commissione.Roma, 04/04/2014
I refer to the proposal published recently (I do not put the link, otherwise I ricensurano the comment). Among other things I do not understand bidvest australia why my comment was censored, since I only repeated what was written in the press.
The ANDU admits publicly with a statement why dell'astio to the ASN: contests must continue to be driven by the master-barons, in defense of the feudal system currently in force (it is explicitly said: drafting Roars, please do not blame me censoring the comments).
My dear anonymous shekerato. What people like you do not quite grasp is that in any way the procedures ANVUR disempower those who want to choose their puppy to warm your feet (without paying the consequences of this choice), rather strengthen it. The contests in fact continue to be banned bidvest australia by the same methods (see article Talamanca competitions with the winner's photo attached) of the past pace of supporters of His Excellency the credit. bidvest australia Who do you agree with the procedures falsely meritocratic ANVUR may be for only two reasons: 1) intellectual inability to understand the limitations and errors; 2) intellectual bidvest australia dishonesty in order to continue to make the pig just convenient.
@ Labini I have a screenshot of my comments censored. I keep them as evidence, in case anyone wanted to discuss bidvest australia the topic. @ Valiante Pray, who are the ones like me? By now you're so accustomed to insults, that even there you make more income. I just criticized a statement ANDU where you sing the praises of the feudal system that currently exists in the academic world (which communicated with anyone in their right mind would agree).
"I just criticized a statement or ANDU where you sing the praises of the feudal system that currently exists in the academic world (which communicated with anyone in their right mind would agree)." bidvest australia ___________ With the small detail that the press ANDU, far from weaving praises of the feudal system, he meant exactly the opposite cone every attentive reader could understand.
Carry quote hoping to have understood "it is almost impossible for the commission to conclude the work in just 50 days (this is to read thousands of pages of text, sound judgments individual bidvest australia and collegial, check the regularity of claims, etc." If this is a topic still under discussion then there is no hope., bidvest australia there is still someone who believes that the ASN is based on the reading (impossible) publications of the candidates. Alternatively, some even are unbalanced in stating that, in the end, the commissioners bidvest australia are good enough bidvest australia to be able to evaluate candidates based on their prior knowledge of the SSD. Perhaps, in addition to careful rereading of the various legislations based on the ASN, it would be appropriate to reiterate the concept of simple "driver" behind the release. On the other hand I do not see why