The blog of Precarious Research in Italy, edited dall

The blog of Precarious Research in Italy, edited dall'APRI (Association of Research Precarious Italian). A place where researchers can discuss the initiatives for reform of University and Research that will lead Italy in Europe and especially consort consultancy in Italy, Europe.
OK, I finally published the medians for both sectors consort consultancy bibliometric than for non-bibliometric cousins losers. The results are tristisssimi for the areas bibliometric the bar is so low that you could do substantially less of the procedure, in many cases, were more selective criteria consort consultancy CUN (and this is to say everything). Often the median consort consultancy of the items is less than or equal to the number of items amenable to qualitative assessment, and this is also a good indicator.
What does it mean? It means that our writers, consort consultancy historians, philosophers and so on. are unproductive? Maybe. Or maybe it simply means that the data are incomplete, that many, very many, have not had the time and inclination to fill out their profiles in CINECA duty. So what does it matter to them? And, the Agency will, moreover, established that cares if the data are partial, incomplete, incorrect, ... They do not take responsibility. consort consultancy There is still no list of journals for sectors not bibliometrics, including in particular that of the missing heads band A. As for the area 12, that of legal science, that of Onida and the famous resort, just those responsible they refused to produce the list of magazines. But you want it to be, so we are faced with the notice longest in history, there is no time ... and the fact that lawyers have not produced the lists (in spite of the provisions of the state law) is clearly not is the problem. Yes, there is time to correct, or even to make new trouble. So far, messes, mistakes, contradictions between the criteria established by laws and decrees and resolutions have been found ANVUR many. Colleagues (structured) of Roars, have gone to catalog all (or most) errors, inaccuracies, the mess created by the Vogon anvuriani. Not that fellow Roars are wrong, but ... unfortunately they're right. But there are other distortions that do not signal with the same decision. For example, consort consultancy the fact that, pies and amenities anvuriane of fact will not prevent any repetition of the classic Italian academic mechanisms that will go on who is more senior, consort consultancy who is lining up for the longest time. As if it were the queue at the post office. This is not the kind of system that APRI has struggled. This is certainly not what happens in the advanced countries. Here, however, we are in Italy, where you compare different lobby, but all of Structured who have little interest in the fate of our generation, the generation born in the seventies. Both are replaceable. They have found a way to solve the problem of temporary workers: with the extermination of an entire generation. Certain criteria ANVUR are filled with limitations in terms of epistemological, administrative, legal, and also only logical; But all this is secondary to the real problem, the authentic drama that is about to be consumed. consort consultancy WE ARE IN FRONT OF A MASSACRE: AN ENTIRE GENERATION 'DATE FOR DEAD AND NO ONE SEEMS TO IMPORT! How many will be temporary workers (expatriates working consort consultancy in institutions or italic) that will get the qualification? Hard to say, certainly are many - many, many thousands - those above the median (and not bibliometric). How many will be the ones to get places - the real ones - in the post-qualification contests? Well, the weather here is easier: almost none, a few units .... And this regardless of the merits, of course ....
I resume the previous academic discussion on the calculation of the age. I had written: "Qualcono explain knows precisely how to calculate the academic age? I catch a glimpse of two possibilities. First possibility: the ten-year period is 2002-2012, so if the first publication figure in previous years goes to climb 2003 -> 9 years 2004 -> 8 years, etc. .. It is the fault of the 2012 -> 0 years and normalizing is infinite. consort consultancy Second chance if y is the year of first publication of the academic age is y = 2012 -y +1. In this case there is a strong contradiction to the 2002 academic age of 11 years appears to be in contradiction with the definition of the observation period of 10 years 2002-2012. Thank you. Emergence replied gdrogo, the The second mechanism is that you indicated, but you have to count the months, because there sonciderano the months of leave (parental or otherwise). then 10 years = 120 months. subtract the number of months (or y) and the chief 12. 120-y ... so +12 is the academic age. 120/il do once you get the result. numeo what you get is that you have to multiply by the number of your publications.